We already know the justification for the decision to discontinue the rehabilitation proceedings of Hawe Telkom sp. o.o. in restructuring.

The court shared the company’s arguments, giving the primacy to the principles of transparency of proceedings and the concordant wishes of the participants, and granted, among others, the objections raised regarding:

– unreasonable declaration of the inadmissibility of changing the arrangement proposals in the voting mode, without convening the creditors’ meeting,

– harming creditors by canceling the rehabilitation proceedings in a situation where both the creditors and the debtor were interested in continuing it,

– the inadmissibility of applying the provisions on the withdrawal of the claim (per analogiam) to the withdrawal of arrangement proposals by the debtor.